You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ecological Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07010132.x |
| Authors |
Christopher P. Dunn, Forest Stearns, Glenn R. Guntenspergen, David M. Sharpe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 68 | 81% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 68 | 81% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,238,859
of 24,674,353 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,020
of 3,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,173
of 47,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#33
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.