↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic biology of polyketide synthases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,612)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Synthetic biology of polyketide synthases
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10295-018-2021-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoshi Yuzawa, Tyler W H Backman, Jay D Keasling, Leonard Katz

Abstract

Complex reduced polyketides represent the largest class of natural products that have applications in medicine, agriculture, and animal health. This structurally diverse class of compounds shares a common methodology of biosynthesis employing modular enzyme systems called polyketide synthases (PKSs). The modules are composed of enzymatic domains that share sequence and functional similarity across all known PKSs. We have used the nomenclature of synthetic biology to classify the enzymatic domains and modules as parts and devices, respectively, and have generated detailed lists of both. In addition, we describe the chassis (hosts) that are used to assemble, express, and engineer the parts and devices to produce polyketides. We describe a recently developed software tool to design PKS system and provide an example of its use. Finally, we provide perspectives of what needs to be accomplished to fully realize the potential that synthetic biology approaches bring to this class of molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 27%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 30%
Chemistry 17 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 15%
Unspecified 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,396,634
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#36
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,607
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.