| Title |
Systematic planning for digital preservation: evaluating potential strategies and building preservation plans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal on Digital Libraries, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00799-009-0057-1 |
| Authors |
Christoph Becker, Hannes Kulovits, Mark Guttenbrunner, Stephan Strodl, Andreas Rauber, Hans Hofman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 27% |
| Librarian | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 67 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 24 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#129
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,254
of 163,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them