↓ Skip to main content

Eu-Detect: An algorithm for detecting eukaryotic sequences in metagenomic data sets

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings: Plant Sciences, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Eu-Detect: An algorithm for detecting eukaryotic sequences in metagenomic data sets
Published in
Proceedings: Plant Sciences, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12038-011-9105-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monzoorul Haque Mohammed, Sudha Chadaram, Dinakar Komanduri, Tarini Shankar Ghosh, Sharmila S Mande

Abstract

Physical partitioning techniques are routinely employed (during sample preparation stage) for segregating the prokaryotic and eukaryotic fractions of metagenomic samples. In spite of these efforts, several metagenomic studies focusing on bacterial and archaeal populations have reported the presence of contaminating eukaryotic sequences in metagenomic data sets. Contaminating sequences originate not only from genomes of micro-eukaryotic species but also from genomes of (higher) eukaryotic host cells. The latter scenario usually occurs in the case of host-associated metagenomes. Identification and removal of contaminating sequences is important, since these sequences not only impact estimates of microbial diversity but also affect the accuracy of several downstream analyses. Currently, the computational techniques used for identifying contaminating eukaryotic sequences, being alignment based, are slow, inefficient, and require huge computing resources. In this article, we present Eu-Detect, an alignment-free algorithm that can rapidly identify eukaryotic sequences contaminating metagenomic data sets. Validation results indicate that on a desktop with modest hardware specifications, the Eu-Detect algorithm is able to rapidly segregate DNA sequence fragments of prokaryotic and eukaryotic origin, with high sensitivity. A Web server for the Eu-Detect algorithm is available at http://metagenomics.atc.tcs.com/Eu-Detect/.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 5%
France 3 4%
Portugal 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#113
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,136
of 137,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.