↓ Skip to main content

A Survey of Strategies Adopted by UK Wildlife Trusts in the Promotion of Gardening for Wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Environment Systems and Decisions, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
A Survey of Strategies Adopted by UK Wildlife Trusts in the Promotion of Gardening for Wildlife
Published in
Environment Systems and Decisions, March 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1022995610486
Authors

Colin Ryall, Peter Hatherell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2008.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#147
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,142
of 62,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them