↓ Skip to main content

Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Current Treatment Options

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Current Treatment Options
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1674-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Cadotte, Michael G. Fehlings

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event often resulting in permanent neurologic deficit. Research has revealed an understanding of mechanisms that occur after the primary injury and contribute to functional loss. By targeting these secondary mechanisms of injury, clinicians may be able to offer improved recovery after SCI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 18%
Neuroscience 21 11%
Engineering 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,228
of 120,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#30
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.