↓ Skip to main content

File size models for shared content over the BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer network

Overview of attention for article published in Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
File size models for shared content over the BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer network
Published in
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12083-011-0122-6
Authors

Mohammed Hawa, Jamal S. Rahhal, Dia I. Abu-Al-Nadi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 17%
United States 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 67%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
#15
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,731
of 243,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them