↓ Skip to main content

Simulating simultanagnosia: spatially constricted vision mimics local capture and the global processing deficit

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Simulating simultanagnosia: spatially constricted vision mimics local capture and the global processing deficit
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00221-009-2152-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten A. Dalrymple, Walter F. Bischof, David Cameron, Jason J. S. Barton, Alan Kingstone

Abstract

Patients with simultanagnosia, which is a component of Bálint syndrome, have a restricted spatial window of visual attention and cannot see more than one object at a time. As a result, these patients see the world in a piecemeal fashion, seeing the local components of objects or scenes at the expense of the global picture. To directly test the relationship between the restriction of the attentional window in simultanagnosia and patients' difficulty with global-level processing, we used a gaze-contingent display to create a literal restriction of vision for healthy participants while they performed a global/local identification task. Participants in this viewing condition were instructed to identify the global and local aspects of hierarchical letter stimuli of different sizes and densities. They performed well at the local identification task, and their patterns of inaccuracies for the global level task were highly similar to the pattern of inaccuracies typically seen with simultanagnosic patients. This suggests that a restricted spatial area of visual processing, combined with normal limits to visual processing, can lead to difficulties with global-level perception.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Germany 2 5%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 43%
Engineering 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,823
of 164,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.