↓ Skip to main content

Body size perceptions and preferences favor overweight in adult Saharawi refugees

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Body size perceptions and preferences favor overweight in adult Saharawi refugees
Published in
Nutrition Journal, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12937-018-0330-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Desire Alice Naigaga, David Jahanlu, Hanne Marit Claudius, Anne Karine Gjerlaug, Ingrid Barikmo, Sigrun Henjum

Abstract

Culture affects body image and body size perceptions from an early age and in many African countries, overweight has been associated with richness, health, strength, and fertility. The present study investigated body size perceptions and preferences in an African refugee population. The cross-sectional study was comprised of 180 and 175 randomly selected Saharawi women and men, respectively, between 18 and 80 years. Stunkard's body figure scale was used to identify self-perceived body size, desired body size and desired body size in the opposite gender. Approximately half of the participants had a correct self-perceived body size; among them 70% did not have a desire to have a smaller body size. Among women who preferred a body size corresponding to overweight in men, 77% also had a desired body size corresponding to overweight; compared to 43% for men. The youngest participants (18-25 years) were the least likely to overestimate their body size in comparison to the older participants (26-45 years and 46-80 years). We found an overall preference for an overweight body size, and a significant difference in body size perception associated with age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 48 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 48 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,709,189
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#603
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,107
of 453,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.