↓ Skip to main content

Constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome: have we so far seen only the tip of an iceberg?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome: have we so far seen only the tip of an iceberg?
Published in
Human Genetics, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00439-008-0542-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Wimmer, Julia Etzler

Abstract

Heterozygous mutations in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 cause the dominant adult cancer syndrome termed Lynch syndrome or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. During the past 10 years, some 35 reports have delineated the phenotype of patients with biallelic inheritance of mutations in one of these MMR genes. The patients suffer from a condition that is characterised by the development of childhood cancers, mainly haematological malignancies and/or brain tumours, as well as early-onset colorectal cancers. Almost all patients also show signs reminiscent of neurofibromatosis type 1, mainly café au lait spots. Alluding to the underlying mechanism, this condition may be termed as "constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency (CMMR-D) syndrome". To give an overview of the current knowledge and its implications of this recessively inherited cancer syndrome we summarise here the genetic, clinical and pathological findings of the so far 78 reported patients of 46 families suffering from this syndrome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 14%
Computer Science 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2009.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,082
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,497
of 96,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.