↓ Skip to main content

In Vivo Electrical Conductivity across Critical Nerve Gaps Using Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-Coated Neural Interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Vivo Electrical Conductivity across Critical Nerve Gaps Using Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-Coated Neural Interfaces
Published in
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, December 2010
DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181f61848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brent M. Egeland, Melanie G. Urbanchek, Antonio Peramo, Sarah M. Richardson-Burns, David C. Martin, Daryl R. Kipke, William M. Kuzon, Paul S. Cederna

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Chemistry 3 9%
Materials Science 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#3,960
of 10,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,625
of 190,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#20
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.