| Title |
Enzymatic production of cyclodextrins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00253-002-1057-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Biwer, G. Antranikian, E. Heinzle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 88 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 77 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 7% |
| Engineering | 22 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 97 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,545,582
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#535
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,378
of 45,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.