| Title |
GestationaL Obesity Weight management: Implementation of National Guidelines (GLOWING): a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a guideline implementation intervention for the management of maternal obesity by midwives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0241-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Heslehurst, Judith Rankin, Catherine McParlin, Falko F. Sniehotta, Denise Howel, Stephen Rice, Elaine McColl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 47% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 41% |
| Scientists | 9 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,992,361
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#86
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,046
of 457,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.