| Title |
A Functional Neuroimaging Case Study of Meares–Irlen Syndrome/Visual Stress (MISViS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Topography, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10548-011-0212-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brea D. Chouinard, Crystal I. Zhou, Stanislau Hrybouski, Esther S. Kim, Jacqueline Cummine |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,655,010
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#159
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,734
of 242,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them