↓ Skip to main content

Sulfur and primary production in aquatic environments: an ecological perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Sulfur and primary production in aquatic environments: an ecological perspective
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11120-005-3250-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Norici, Ruediger Hell, Mario Giordano

Abstract

Sulfur is one of the critical elements in living matter, as it participates in several structural, metabolic and catalytic activities. Photosynthesis is an important process that entails the use of sulfur during both the light and carbon reactions. Nearly half of global photosynthetic carbon fixation is carried out by phytoplankton in the aquatic environment. Aquatic environments are very different from one another with respect to sulfur content: while in the oceans sulfate concentration is constantly high, freshwaters are characterized by daily and seasonal variations and by a wide range of sulfur concentration. The strategies that algal cells adopt for energy and resource allocation often reflect these differences. In the oceans, the amount and chemical form of sulfur has changed substantially during the course of the Earth's history; it is possible that sulfur availability played a role in the evolution of marine phytoplankton communities and it may continue to have appreciable effects on global biogeochemistry and ecology. Phytoplankton is also the main biogenic source of sulfur; sulfur can be released into the atmosphere by algal cells as dimethylsulfide, with possibly important repercussions on global climate. These and related matters are discussed in this review.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 102 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 26%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 15 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Professor 5 4%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 33%
Environmental Science 28 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 10%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#195
of 769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,755
of 60,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 769 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.