↓ Skip to main content

Tactile discriminatory ability and foraging strategies in Kangaroo rats and pocket mice (Rodentia: Heteromyidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Tactile discriminatory ability and foraging strategies in Kangaroo rats and pocket mice (Rodentia: Heteromyidae)
Published in
Oecologia, September 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00344967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra K. Lawhon, Mark S. Hafner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 14%
United States 1 7%
Mexico 1 7%
Unknown 10 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Unspecified 2 14%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 50%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Unspecified 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,673
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,861
of 7,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.