↓ Skip to main content

Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Loneliness in Adults: The Netherlands Twin Register Study

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 971)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Chapter title
Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Loneliness in Adults: The Netherlands Twin Register Study
Published in
Behavior Genetics, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10519-005-6040-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorret I. Boomsma, Gonneke Willemsen, Conor V. Dolan, Louise C. Hawkley, John T. Cacioppo

Abstract

Heritability estimates based on two small studies in children indicate that the genetic contribution to individual differences in loneliness is approximately 50%. Heritability estimates of complex traits such as loneliness may change across the lifespan, however, as the frequency, duration, and range of exposure to environmental influences accrues, or as the expression of genetic factors changes. We examined data on loneliness from 8,387 young adult and adult Dutch twins who had participated in longitudinal survey studies. A measure of loneliness was developed based on factor analyses of items of the YASR (The Young Adult Self Report). Variation in loneliness was analyzed with genetic structural equation models. The estimate of genetic contributions to variation in loneliness in adults was 48%, which is similar to the heritability estimates found previously in children. There was no evidence for sex or age differences in genetic architecture. Sex differences in prevalence were significant, but we did not see an association with age or birth cohort. All resemblance between twin relatives was explained by shared genes, without any suggestion of a contribution of shared environmental factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Professor 10 5%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 31%
Social Sciences 22 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#385,227
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#16
of 971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#471
of 76,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.