↓ Skip to main content

音響性外傷に対するビタミンB1の予防的意義に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, January 1957
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
音響性外傷に対するビタミンB1の予防的意義に関する研究
Published in
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, January 1957
DOI 10.3950/jibiinkoka.60.350a
Authors

安藤 昌人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#141
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,452
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them