You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The etiology of social phobia: empirical evidence and an initial model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychology Review, November 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.06.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald M. Rapee, Susan H. Spence |
| Abstract |
Research into the etiology of social phobia has lagged far behind that of descriptive and maintaining factors. The current paper reviews data from a variety of sources that have some bearing on questions of the origins of social fears. Areas examined include genetic factors, temperament, childrearing, negative life events, and adverse social experiences. Epidemiological data are examined in detail and factors associated with social phobia such as cognitive distortions and social skills are also covered. The paper concludes with an initial model that draws together some of the current findings and aims to provide a platform for future research directions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 663 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 633 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 134 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 108 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 15% |
| Researcher | 57 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 9% |
| Other | 100 | 15% |
| Unknown | 106 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 413 | 62% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 6% |
| Unknown | 122 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,499,093
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#411
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,954
of 74,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.