↓ Skip to main content

International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
527 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 1988
DOI 10.1200/jco.1988.6.12.1874
Pubmed ID
Authors

G M Brodeur, R C Seeger, A Barrett, F Berthold, R P Castleberry, G D'Angio, B De Bernardi, A E Evans, M Favrot, A I Freeman

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is one of the most common tumors in childhood. However, it often has been difficult to compare clinical and laboratory studies of this disease due to a lack of uniform criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response. An international group of conferees addressed each of these issues and reached a consensus. Specific criteria for making a diagnosis of neuroblastoma are defined. A new neuroblastoma staging system is proposed that takes into account the most important elements of current but incompatible systems. Finally, criteria for response to treatment are standardized. The criteria proposed herein represent an international consensus of essentially every major pediatric oncology group or organization in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The staging system should be referred to as the International Neuroblastoma Staging System, and the response criteria as the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria. Implementation of these criteria will greatly facilitate the comparison of clinical and laboratory studies by different groups and countries. Furthermore, these criteria should serve as a foundation on which future modifications or improvements can be based.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,877,901
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#9,485
of 20,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,852
of 54,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.