↓ Skip to main content

Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees
Published in
Oecologia, January 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1480-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Andresen, Douglas J. Levey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 19 5%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Mexico 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 306 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 17%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 46 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 218 62%
Environmental Science 63 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 55 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,058
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,527
of 151,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.