↓ Skip to main content

Overlaps Between Autism and Language Impairment: Phenomimicry or Shared Etiology?

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Overlaps Between Autism and Language Impairment: Phenomimicry or Shared Etiology?
Published in
Behavior Genetics, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10519-010-9381-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. V. M. Bishop

Abstract

Traditionally, autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) and specific language impairment (SLI) are regarded as distinct conditions with separate etiologies. Yet these disorders co-occur at above chance levels, suggesting shared etiology. Simulations, however, show that additive pleiotropic genes cannot account for observed rates of language impairment in relatives, which are higher for probands with SLI than for those with ASD + language impairment. An alternative account is in terms of 'phenomimicry', i.e., language impairment in comorbid cases may be a consequence of ASD risk factors, and different from that seen in SLI. However, this cannot explain why molecular genetic studies have found a common risk genotype for ASD and SLI. This paper explores whether nonadditive genetic influences could account for both family and molecular findings. A modified simulation involving G x G interactions obtained levels of comorbidity and rates of impairment in relatives more consistent with observed values. The simulations further suggest that the shape of distributions of phenotypic trait scores for different genotypes may provide evidence of whether a gene is involved in epistasis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
Unknown 247 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 18%
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 41%
Neuroscience 20 8%
Linguistics 19 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 41 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,459,441
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#125
of 909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,370
of 95,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.