↓ Skip to main content

Mitogenomic Analyses Place the Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) on the Crocodile Tree and Provide Pre-K/T Divergence Times for Most Crocodilians

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Mitogenomic Analyses Place the Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) on the Crocodile Tree and Provide Pre-K/T Divergence Times for Most Crocodilians
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00239-004-0336-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Janke, Anette Gullberg, Sandrine Hughes, Ramesh K. Aggarwal, Ulfur Arnason

Abstract

Based on morphological analyses, extant members of the order Crocodylia are divided into three families, Alligatoridae, Crocodylidae, and Gavialidae. Gavialidae includes one species, the gharial, Gavialis gangeticus. In this study we have examined crocodilian relationships in phylogenetic analyses of seven mitochondrial genomes that have been sequenced in their entirety. The analyses did not support the morphologically acknowledged separate position of the gharial in the crocodilian tree. Instead the gharial joined the false gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii) on a common branch that was shown to constitute a sister group to traditional Crocodylidae (less Tomistoma). Thus, the analyses suggest the recognition of only two Crocodylia families, Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae, with the latter encompassing traditional Crocodylidae plus Gavialis/Tomistoma. A molecular dating of the divergence between Alligatoridae and Crocodylidae suggests that this basal split among recent crocodilians took place approximately 140 million years before present, at the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary. The results suggest that at least five crocodilian lineages survived the mass extinction at the KT boundary.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 4%
Germany 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 126 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 59%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 15%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,468
of 59,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.