↓ Skip to main content

Approximate entropy and point correlation dimension of heart rate variability in healthy subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, October 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Approximate entropy and point correlation dimension of heart rate variability in healthy subjects
Published in
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, October 1998
DOI 10.1007/bf02688699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. Storella, Harrison W. Wood, Kenneth M. Mills, Jørgen K. Kanters, Michael V. Højgaard, Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou

Abstract

The contribution of nonlinear dynamics to heart rate variability in healthy humans was examined using surrogate data analysis. Several measures of heart rate variability were used and compared. Heart rates were recorded for three hours and original data sets of 8192 R-R intervals created. For each original data set (n = 34), three surrogate data sets were made by shuffling the order of the R-R intervals while retaining their linear correlations. The difference in heart rate variability between the original and surrogate data sets reflects the amount of nonlinear structure in the original data set. Heart rate variability was analyzed by two different nonlinear methods, point correlation dimension and approximate entropy. Nonlinearity, though under 10 percent, could be detected with both types of heart rate variability measures. More importantly, not only were the correlations between these measures and the standard deviation of the R-R intervals weak, the correlation among the nonlinear measures themselves was also weak (generally less than 0.6). This suggests that in addition to standard linear measures of heart rate variability, the use of multiple nonlinear measures of heart rate variability might be useful in monitoring heart rate dynamics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Engineering 3 20%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#53
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,571
of 32,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them