↓ Skip to main content

Malaria Vaccines: Moving Forward After Encouraging First Steps

Overview of attention for article published in Current Tropical Medicine Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Malaria Vaccines: Moving Forward After Encouraging First Steps
Published in
Current Tropical Medicine Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40475-015-0041-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuan M. Tran, Silvia Portugal, Simon J. Draper, Peter D. Crompton

Abstract

An effective malaria vaccine that reduces morbidity and mortality and contributes to malaria elimination is a much-needed tool, particularly in endemic areas where health-care delivery and vector control efforts are difficult to sustain. RTS,S/AS01 is likely to be the first licensed malaria vaccine and represents an important step toward malaria control and elimination. However, a partially effective vaccine such as RTS,S/AS01 poses challenges for evaluating the efficacy of second-generation malaria vaccines. Whole-sporozoite immunization approaches have shown promising results, inducing sterile immunity in small-scale trials of malaria-naïve adults, but may not achieve durable sterile protection in endemic populations. Vaccines targeting both the pre-erythrocytic and the erythrocyte-invasive form of the parasite (merozoites) may abrogate breakthrough infections by neutralizing merozoites emerging from infected hepatocytes, whereas vaccines targeting the sexual stages seek to break the transmission cycle. Moving forward, a multi-stage vaccine could be the next step toward malaria elimination and eradication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Researcher 9 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,349,431
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Current Tropical Medicine Reports
#63
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,435
of 352,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Tropical Medicine Reports
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.