↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Biophysical Characterization

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,570)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
151 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
246 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Biophysical Characterization
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eran Leshem, Israel Zilberman, Cory M. Tschabrunn, Michael Barkagan, Fernando M. Contreras-Valdes, Assaf Govari, Elad Anter

Abstract

This study sought to examine the biophysical properties of high-power and short-duration (HP-SD) radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation ablation. However, pulmonary vein reconnection is frequent and is often the result of catheter instability, tissue edema, and a reversible nontransmural injury. We postulated that HP-SD ablation increases lesion-to-lesion uniformity and transmurality. This study included 20 swine and a novel open-irrigated ablation catheter with a thermocouple system able to record temperature at the catheter-tissue interface (QDOT Micro Catheter). Step 1 compared 3 HP-SD ablation settings: 90 W/4 s, 90 W/6 s, and 70 W/8 s in a thigh muscle preparation. Ablation at 90 W/4 s was identified as the best compromise between lesion size and safety parameters, with no steam-pop or char. In step 2, a total of 174 single ablation applications were performed in the beating heart and resulted in 3 (1.7%) steam-pops, all occurring at catheter-tissue interface temperature ≥85°C. Additional 233 applications at 90 W/4 s and temperature limit of 65°C were applied without steam-pop. Step 3 compared the presence of gaps and lesion transmurality in atrial lines and pulmonary vein isolation between HP-SD (90 W/4 s, T ≤65°C) and standard (25 W/20 s) ablation. HP-SD ablation resulted in 100% contiguous lines with all transmural lesions, whereas standard ablation had linear gaps in 25% and partial thickness lesions in 29%. Ablation with HP-SD produced wider lesions (6.02 ± 0.2 mm vs. 4.43 ± 1.0 mm; p = 0.003) at similar depth (3.58 ± 0.3 mm vs. 3.53 ± 0.6 mm; p = 0.81) and improved lesion-to-lesion uniformity with comparable safety end points. In a preclinical model, HP-SD ablation (90 W/4 s, T ≤65°C) produced an improved lesion-to-lesion uniformity, linear contiguity, and transmurality at a similar safety profile of conventional ablation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 20%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 37%
Engineering 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 48 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#371,883
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#36
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,628
of 449,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.