| Title |
GibbonFACS: A Muscle-Based Facial Movement Coding System for Hylobatids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-012-9611-6 |
| Authors |
Bridget M. Waller, Manuela Lembeck, Paul Kuchenbuch, Anne M. Burrows, Katja Liebal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 42% |
| Psychology | 11 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,145
of 166,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.