↓ Skip to main content

The fluid dynamics and thermodynamics of eruption columns

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, June 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
375 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
The fluid dynamics and thermodynamics of eruption columns
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, June 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf01079681
Authors

A. W. Woods

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 121 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 70 54%
Engineering 12 9%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Energy 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,994
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#227
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,565
of 13,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them