↓ Skip to main content

Rapid and reliable detection of previous freezing of cerebral tissue by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Rapid and reliable detection of previous freezing of cerebral tissue by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-9955-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan A. Bolliger, Doris Tomasin, Jakob Heimer, Henning Richter, Michael J. Thali, Dominic Gascho

Abstract

Due to slowing or even inhibition of postmortem processes, freezing may make an estimation of the time-since-death very difficult. This is also true in previously frozen and subsequently thawed bodies. Knowledge of prior freezing is important, as it may lead to a different assessment of the time since death. Twelve pig heads were frozen at -20 °C, and 6 heads were either kept at room temperature (approximately 20 °C) or in a cooling cell (approximately 5 °C). The frozen brains and cadavers were thawed at either room temperature or in a cooling cell. All specimens underwent repeated CT and MRI scanning until the brains were sampled for histological examination. Two radiologists assessed the images and two pathologists reviewed the histological slides with regard to thawing artifacts and putrefaction. All raters were blinded regarding whether the samples had been frozen, for how long and how they had been thawed. Imaging revealed distinct, tiny bubble-like artifacts only in previously frozen specimens. Histology also revealed artifacts only seen in such cases, namely very distinct, columnar bubbles in the cerebral cortex. All raters successfully identified previously unfrozen brains (100% specificity) and nearly all previously frozen brains. Our results suggest that initial post-mortem imaging can be of enormous importance in everyday forensic practice by identifying possible cases of previous freezing - cases that would therefore warrant closer scrutiny and thus raise caution regarding the time of death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#407
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,319
of 452,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.