↓ Skip to main content

Shifting to Value-Based Principles in Sickness Insurance: Challenges in Changing Roles and Culture

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Shifting to Value-Based Principles in Sickness Insurance: Challenges in Changing Roles and Culture
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10926-018-9759-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Ståhl, Frieda Andersson

Abstract

Purpose Management principles in insurance agencies influence how benefits are administered, and how return to work processes for clients are managed and supported. This study analyses a change in managerial principles within the Swedish Sickness Insurance Agency, and how this has influenced the role of insurance officials in relation to discretion and accountability, and their relationship to clients. Methods The study is based on a qualitative approach comprising 57 interviews with officials and managers in four insurance offices. Results The reforms have led to a change in how public and professional accountability is defined, where the focus is shifted from routines and performance measurements toward professional discretion and the quality of encounters. However, the results show how these changes are interpreted differently across different layers of the organization, where New Public Management principles prevail in how line managers give feedback on and reward the work of officials. Conclusions The study illustrates how the introduction of new principles to promote officials' discretion does not easily bypass longstanding management strategies, in this case managing accountability through top-down performance measures. The study points out the importance for public organizations to reconcile new organizational principles with the current organizational culture and how this is manifested through managerial styles, which may be resistant to change. Promoting client-oriented and value-driven approaches in client work hence needs to acknowledge the importance of organizational culture, and to secure that changes are reflected in organizational procedures and routines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 3 7%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 11%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#19,600,237
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#574
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,938
of 456,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.