You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Big data techniques in auditing research and practice: Current trends and future opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Accounting Literature, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.acclit.2017.05.003 |
| Authors |
Adrian Gepp, Martina K. Linnenluecke, Terrence J. O’Neill, Tom Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 866 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 866 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 104 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 64 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 5% |
| Other | 157 | 18% |
| Unknown | 334 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 275 | 32% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 86 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 68 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 3% |
| Engineering | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 5% |
| Unknown | 348 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,371,676
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Accounting Literature
#4
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,331
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Accounting Literature
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.