| Title |
Optimal Mass Transport for Registration and Warping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:visi.0000036836.66311.97 |
| Authors |
Steven Haker, Lei Zhu, Allen Tannenbaum, Sigurd Angenent |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 35% |
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 43 | 33% |
| Engineering | 24 | 18% |
| Mathematics | 23 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#127
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,883
of 151,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.