↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in Transition of Care for Pediatric Patients after Weight-Reduction Surgery: a Systematic Review and Recommendations for Comprehensive Care

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Challenges in Transition of Care for Pediatric Patients after Weight-Reduction Surgery: a Systematic Review and Recommendations for Comprehensive Care
Published in
Obesity Surgery, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-3138-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah B. Cairo, Indrajit Majumdar, Aurora Pryor, Alan Posner, Carroll M. Harmon, David H. Rothstein, on behalf of the Delivery of Surgical Care Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery

Abstract

Obesity in pediatric patients is rising with nearly one third of children in the USA classified as overweight and up to 16-18% of the adolescent population obese with at least one comorbid condition. Consequently, bariatric procedures in this population have increased without consistent recommendations for follow-up and transition to adult providers. This review describes the known and potential long-term consequences of bariatric surgery in pediatric patients, reviews the current literature on transitions of care for adolescent patients with chronic illnesses. Additionally, this review summarizes recommendations from the literature for developing a standardized program for transitioning care for post-bariatric surgical patients and offers useful tools and guidelines for doing so.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 15 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#13,889,808
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#1,757
of 3,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,200
of 442,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#23
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.