↓ Skip to main content

Design and In Vitro Evaluation of Finasteride-Loaded Liquid Crystalline Nanoparticles for Topical Delivery

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Design and In Vitro Evaluation of Finasteride-Loaded Liquid Crystalline Nanoparticles for Topical Delivery
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, December 2012
DOI 10.1208/s12249-012-9888-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thiagarajan Madheswaran, Rengarajan Baskaran, Raj Kumar Thapa, Jeong Yeon Rhyu, Hye Yoon Choi, Jong Oh Kim, Chul Soon Yong, Bong Kyu Yoo

Abstract

In this study, liquid crystalline nanoparticles (LCN) have been proposed as new carrier for topical delivery of finasteride (FNS) in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. To evaluate the potential of this nanocarrier, FNS-loaded LCN was prepared by ultrasonication method and characterized for size, shape, in vitro release, and skin permeation-retention properties. The particle size ranged from 153.8 to 170.2 nm with a cubical shape and exhibited controlled release profile with less than 20% of the drug released in the first 24 h. The release profile was significantly altered with addition of different additives. Formulation with lower monoolein exhibited higher skin permeation with a flux rate of 0.061±0.005 μg cm(-2) h(-1) in 24 h. The permeation however, significantly increased with glycerol, propylene glycol, and polyethylene glycol 400, while it declined for the addition of oleic acid. A similar trend was observed with skin retention study. In conclusion, FNS-loaded LCN could be advocated as a viable alternative for oral administration of the drug.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Chemistry 7 8%
Materials Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,208,880
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#422
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,591
of 278,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.