↓ Skip to main content

Reduction of Health Care Costs and Improved Appropriateness of Incoming Test Orders: the Impact of Genetic Counselor Review in an Academic Genetic Testing Laboratory

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,291)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Reduction of Health Care Costs and Improved Appropriateness of Incoming Test Orders: the Impact of Genetic Counselor Review in an Academic Genetic Testing Laboratory
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10897-018-0226-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Wakefield, Haley Keller, Hannah Mianzo, Chinmayee B. Nagaraj, Sanjukta Tawde, Elizabeth Ulm

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of genetic counselor (GC) review of incoming test orders received in an academic diagnostic molecular genetics laboratory. The GC team measured the proportion of orders that could be modified to improve efficiency or sensitivity, tracked provider uptake of GC proposed testing changes, and calculated the health care dollar savings resulting from GC intervention. During this 6-month study, the GC team reviewed 2367 incoming test orders. Of these, 109 orders (4.6%) were flagged for review for potentially inefficient or inappropriate test ordering. These flagged orders corresponded to a total of 51 cases (1-5 orders for each patient), representing 54 individuals and including 3 sibling pairs. The GC team proposed a modification for each flagged case and the ordering providers approved the proposed change for 49 of 51 cases (96.08%). For the 49 modifications, the cost savings totaled $98,750.64, for an average of $2015.32 saved per modification. This study provides evidence of the significant contribution of genetic counselors in a laboratory setting and demonstrates the benefit of laboratories working with ordering providers to identify the best test for their patients. The review of test orders by a genetic counselor both improves genetic test ordering strategies and decreases the amount of health care dollars spent on genetic testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Other 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,731,213
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#48
of 1,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,365
of 452,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#6
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.