↓ Skip to main content

Wild Animal Suffering is Intractable

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Wild Animal Suffering is Intractable
Published in
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10806-018-9722-y
Authors

Nicolas Delon, Duncan Purves

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 15%
Philosophy 5 12%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,836,193
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#72
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,609
of 456,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.