↓ Skip to main content

Oral health indicators for risk of malnutrition in elders

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Oral health indicators for risk of malnutrition in elders
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12603-017-0887-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

L.L. Wu, K.Y. Cheung, P.Y.P. Lam, Xiaoli Gao

Abstract

Using both clinical parameters and subjective measures of oral health, this study aimed to identify useful oral health indicators for the risk of malnutrition in elders. Cross-sectional study. Five community centers run by non-government organizations (NGOs). 195 community dwelling elders (65 or above). An interviewer-administered questionnaire was completed to collect information on elders' socio-demographic background and oral health perception and practice. Their number of teeth, number of occluding tooth pairs, dental caries, and periodontal condition were examined. General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), an instrument for assessing oral health related quality of life (OHQoL), was used as a subjective measure of oral health. The elders' nutritional status was evaluated by using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA). The mean (SD) DFT was 3.3 (3.1). Over 60% of elders had periodontal pockets; 33% had fewer than 20 teeth and 6% were edentulous. The mean (SD) of occluding tooth pairs was 7.1 (4.8). The mean (SD) total GOHAI score was 56.4 (8.0); 60% reported negative impact of oral health on their quality of life. The mean (SD) MNA score was 25.0 (2.9); 30% had malnutrition or were at risk. After controlling for socio-demographic factors, none of the clinical indicators (dental caries, periodontal status, number of teeth, and number of occluding tooth pairs) were associated with risk of malnutrition (all p>0.05). Poorer OHQoL indicated a higher chance for malnutrition in both adjusted models (OR of 0.914; 95% CI of 0.850-0.982; p=0.014 and OR of 0.915; 95% CI of 0.852-0.984; p=0.017). Tooth loss and untreated decayed teeth (DT) were significant/marginally significant determinants of poor OHQoL. Elders' tooth loss and unmet treatment need for dental caries were associated with compromised quality of life, which indicated increased likelihood for malnutrition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Researcher 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 49 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 53 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,329,992
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,035
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,166
of 451,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#32
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.