↓ Skip to main content

Venus looks different from day to night across wavelengths: morphology from Akatsuki multispectral images

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Venus looks different from day to night across wavelengths: morphology from Akatsuki multispectral images
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40623-018-0789-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjay S. Limaye, Shigeto Watanabe, Atsushi Yamazaki, Manabu Yamada, Takehiko Satoh, Takao M. Sato, Masato Nakamura, Makoto Taguchi, Tetsuya Fukuhara, Takeshi Imamura, Toru Kouyama, Yeon Joo Lee, Takeshi Horinouchi, Javier Peralta, Naomoto Iwagami, George L. Hashimoto, Seiko Takagi, Shoko Ohtsuki, Shin-ya Murakami, Yukio Yamamoto, Kazunori Ogohara, Hiroki Ando, Ko-ichiro Sugiyama, Nobuaki Ishii, Takumi Abe, Chikako Hirose, Makoto Suzuki, Naru Hirata, Eliot F. Young, Adriana C. Ocampo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 37%
Physics and Astronomy 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,852,306
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#440
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,745
of 454,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.