| Title |
The Populus holobiont: dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0413-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. A. Cregger, A. M. Veach, Z. K. Yang, M. J. Crouch, R. Vilgalys, G. A. Tuskan, C. W. Schadt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 23 | 72% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 327 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 24% |
| Researcher | 59 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 147 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 77 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,384,635
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#465
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,137
of 460,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#25
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.