↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of inappropriate and excessive use of reliever medications in asthma: a 16-year population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 2,021)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of inappropriate and excessive use of reliever medications in asthma: a 16-year population-based study
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12890-018-0598-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamid Tavakoli, J. Mark FitzGerald, Larry D. Lynd, Mohsen Sadatsafavi

Abstract

Understanding factors associated with the inappropriate or excessive use of short-acting beta agonists (SABA) can help develop better policies. We used British Columbian (BC)'s administrative health data (1997-2014) to create a retrospective cohort of asthma patients aged between 14 and 55 years. The primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively, inappropriate and excessive use of SABA based on a previously validated definition. Exposures were categorised into groups comprising socio-demographic variables, indicators of type and quality of asthma care, and burden of comorbid conditions. 343,520 individuals (56.3% female, average age 30.5) satisfied the asthma case definition, contributing 2.6 million person-years. 7.3% of person-years were categorised as inappropriate SABA use and 0.9% as excessive use. Several factors were associated with lower likelihood of inappropriate use, including female sex, higher socio-economic status, higher continuity of care, having received pulmonary function test in the previous year, visited a specialist in the previous year, and the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the previous year. An asthma-related outpatient visit to a general practitioner in the previous year was associated with a higher likelihood of inappropriate SABA use. Similar associations were found for excessive SABA use with the exception that visit to respirologist and the use of systemic corticosteroids were associated with increased likelihood of excessive use. Despite proven safety issues, inappropriate SABA use is still prevalent. Several factors belonging to patients' characteristics and type/quality of care were associated with inappropriate use of SABAs and can be used to risk-stratify patients for targeted attempts to reduce this preventable cause of adverse asthma outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#449,941
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#15
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,056
of 448,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#3
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.