| Title |
Numerical solutions of index-1 differential algebraic equations can be computed in polynomial time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Numerical Algorithms, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11075-005-9007-1 |
| Authors |
Silvana Ilie, Robert M. Corless, Greg Reid |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 3 | 60% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Numerical Algorithms
#20
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,008
of 146,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerical Algorithms
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them