↓ Skip to main content

Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, October 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 309)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
43 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
461 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach
Published in
The Botanical Review, October 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02861082
Authors

James A. Doyle, Michael J. Donoghue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 121 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Professor 14 10%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 58%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 14%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,049,987
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#38
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,356
of 11,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them