↓ Skip to main content

Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, November 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, November 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00240986
Authors

Anna Sierpińska

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Lecturer 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 19 39%
Social Sciences 18 37%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,404,662
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#303
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,547
of 12,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them