| Title |
Integrating multiple cues to depth order at object boundaries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13414-011-0172-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen C. Hildreth, Constance S. Royden |
| Abstract |
We examined the interaction between motion and stereo cues to depth order along object boundaries. Relative depth was conveyed by a change in the speed of image motion across a boundary (motion parallax), the disappearance of features on a surface moving behind an occluding object (motion occlusion), or a difference in the stereo disparity of adjacent surfaces. We compared the perceived depth orders for different combinations of cues, incorporating conditions with conflicting depth orders and conditions with varying reliability of the individual cues. We observed large differences in performance between subjects, ranging from those whose depth order judgments were driven largely by the stereo disparity cues to those whose judgments were dominated by motion occlusion. The relative strength of these cues influenced individual subjects' behavior in conditions of cue conflict and reduced reliability. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 30% |
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,868,706
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#318
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,748
of 118,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.