↓ Skip to main content

On the reported optical activity of amino acids in the Murchison meteorite

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the reported optical activity of amino acids in the Murchison meteorite
Published in
Nature, February 1983
DOI 10.1038/301494a0
Authors

Jeffrey L. Bada, John R. Cronin, Ming-Shan Ho, Keith A. Kvenvolden, James G. Lawless, Stanley L. Miller, J. Oro, Spencer Steinberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 24%
Chemistry 5 24%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,325
of 90,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,812
of 32,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#43
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.