↓ Skip to main content

An alternative method for predicting body mass: the case of the Pleistocene marsupial lion

Overview of attention for article published in Paleobiology, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An alternative method for predicting body mass: the case of the Pleistocene marsupial lion
Published in
Paleobiology, September 2003
DOI 10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029<0403:aamfpb>2.0.co;2
Authors

Stephen Wroe, Troy Myers, Frank Seebacher, Ben Kear, Anna Gillespie, Mathew Crowther, Steve Salisbury

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 7 6%
Australia 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 106 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 47%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 40 33%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,453,126
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Paleobiology
#392
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,043
of 49,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleobiology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.