↓ Skip to main content

A study of association of Oncotype DX recurrence score with DCE-MRI characteristics using multivariate machine learning models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A study of association of Oncotype DX recurrence score with DCE-MRI characteristics using multivariate machine learning models
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00432-018-2595-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashirbani Saha, Michael R. Harowicz, Weiyao Wang, Maciej A. Mazurowski

Abstract

To determine whether multivariate machine learning models of algorithmically assessed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features from breast cancer patients are associated with Oncotype DX (ODX) test recurrence scores. A set of 261 female patients with invasive breast cancer, pre-operative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) images and available ODX score at our institution was identified. A computer algorithm extracted a comprehensive set of 529 features from the DCE-MR images of these patients. The set of patients was divided into a training set and a test set. Using the training set we developed two machine learning-based models to discriminate (1) high ODX scores from intermediate and low ODX scores, and (2) high and intermediate ODX scores from low ODX scores. The performance of these models was evaluated on the independent test set. High against low and intermediate ODX scores were predicted by the multivariate model with AUC 0.77 (95% CI 0.56-0.98, p < 0.003). Low against intermediate and high ODX score was predicted with AUC 0.51 (95% CI 0.41-0.61, p = 0.75). A moderate association between imaging and ODX score was identified. The evaluated models currently do not warrant replacement of ODX with imaging alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 25 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Engineering 7 12%
Computer Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,727,178
of 23,838,611 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#442
of 2,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,166
of 446,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,838,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.