↓ Skip to main content

Metaphysiological and evolutionary dynamics of populations exploiting constant and interactive resources:R?K selection revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Ecology, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Metaphysiological and evolutionary dynamics of populations exploiting constant and interactive resources:R?K selection revisited
Published in
Evolutionary Ecology, May 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01237746
Authors

Wayne M. Getz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 58 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Professor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 41%
Environmental Science 13 20%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,611,089
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#294
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,956
of 20,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.