↓ Skip to main content

Tick-borne encephalitis virus: reference strain Sofjin and problem of its authenticity

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Tick-borne encephalitis virus: reference strain Sofjin and problem of its authenticity
Published in
Virus Genes, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11262-011-0690-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Y. Kovalev, T. A. Mukhacheva, V. S. Kokorev, I. V. Belyaeva

Abstract

The Sofjin strain is one of the first isolates of tick-borne encephalitis virus and, due to its wide distribution in virus collections, it has become the reference strain. Until now, GenBank has recorded several sequences associated with the Sofjin strain that have significant differences between each other. We have sequenced the complete genome of the Sofjin strain from a virus collection and a genome fragment of the two vaccine Sofjin strains. According to phylogenetic analysis, we concluded that the GenBank sequences belong to three independent groups of Sofjin strains of the Far Eastern subtype. Their genetic differences are not a result of microevolution associated with numerous passages. Retrospective analysis of the peculiarities of origin and distribution for each of these groups showed the authenticity of one of them. For the first time, we have determined a complete genome sequence of the authentic reference TBEV strain Sofjin. Two other groups of strains named Sofjin were probably the result of cross-contamination or laboratory error. The high probability of contamination requires the introduction of a new standard for virological laboratories, the key point of which is the obligatory genetic identification of all collection strains.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,413,206
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#143
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,447
of 238,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.