↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with elevated blood pressure or hypertension in Afro-Caribbean youth: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with elevated blood pressure or hypertension in Afro-Caribbean youth: a cross-sectional study
Published in
PeerJ, February 2018
DOI 10.7717/peerj.4385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trevor S. Ferguson, Novie O.M. Younger-Coleman, Marshall K. Tulloch-Reid, Nadia R. Bennett, Amanda E. Rousseau, Jennifer M. Knight-Madden, Maureen E. Samms-Vaughan, Deanna E. Ashley, Rainford J. Wilks

Abstract

Although several studies have identified risk factors for high blood pressure (BP), data from Afro-Caribbean populations are limited. Additionally, less is known about how putative risk factors operate in young adults and how social factors influence the risk of high BP. In this study, we estimated the relative risk for elevated BP or hypertension (EBP/HTN), defined as BP ≥ 120/80 mmHg, among young adults with putative cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in Jamaica and evaluated whether relative risks differed by sex. Data from 898 young adults, 18-20 years old, were analysed. BP was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer after participants had been seated for 5 min. Anthropometric measurements were obtained, and glucose, lipids and insulin measured from a fasting venous blood sample. Data on socioeconomic status (SES) were obtained via questionnaire. CVD risk factor status was defined using standard cut-points or the upper quintile of the distribution where the numbers meeting standard cut-points were small. Relative risks were estimated using odds ratios (OR) from logistic regression models. Prevalence of EBP/HTN was 30% among males and 13% among females (p < 0.001 for sex difference). There was evidence for sex interaction in the relationship between EBP/HTN and some of risk factors (obesity and household possessions), therefore we report sex-specific analyses. In multivariable logistic regression models, factors independently associated with EBP/HTN among men were obesity (OR 8.48, 95% CI [2.64-27.2],p < 0.001), and high glucose (OR 2.01, CI [1.20-3.37],p = 0.008), while high HOMA-IR did not achieve statistical significance (OR 2.08, CI [0.94-4.58],p = 0.069). In similar models for women, high triglycerides (OR 1.98, CI [1.03-3.81],p = 0.040) and high HOMA-IR (OR 2.07, CI [1.03-4.12],p = 0.039) were positively associated with EBP/HTN. Lower SES was also associated with higher odds for EBP/HTN (OR 4.63, CI [1.31-16.4],p = 0.017, for moderate vs. high household possessions; OR 2.61, CI [0.70-9.77],p = 0.154 for low vs. high household possessions). Alcohol consumption was associated with lower odds of EBP/HTN among females only; OR 0.41 (CI [0.18-0.90],p = 0.026) for drinking <1 time per week vs. never drinkers, and OR 0.28 (CI [0.11-0.76],p = 0.012) for drinking ≥3 times per week vs. never drinkers. Physical activity was inversely associated with EBP/HTN in both males and females. Factors associated with EBP/HTN among Jamaican young adults include obesity, high glucose, high triglycerides and high HOMA-IR, with some significant differences by sex. Among women lower SES was positively associated with EBP/HTN, while moderate alcohol consumption was associated lower odds of EBP/HTN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 27 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 26 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,869,860
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#5,600
of 13,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,252
of 446,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#194
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.